Proposal for Pale Masters
Proposal for Pale Masters
Some time ago, an avlis player brought up the point that Pale Master implementation in CoPaP wasn't in line with their implementation in PnP. Our line in Avlis is generally not to change things unless its to bring them in line with PnP (as in our spellhooking project). There are two potential pale master changes:
(1) At level 6 of Pale Master, the undead graft should give +4 to STR in PnP.
(2) Immunity to Criticals at level 10 should also give immunity to sneak attack. NWN botched this and it doesn't. (From the PH--anything immune to criticals is automatically immune to sneak attacks).
Why I bring this up here: If Avlis does a fix of this, it would be done by dynamically adding properties to the new creature hide system that Mistcaller coded. This means that a character recieving these abilities on world X would have them when they portal to world Y, since their hide comes along for the ride. So if Avlis implements these changes, all pale masters across CoPaP will likely recieve them, so CoPaP input is a must before deciding if these should go in.
There are two relavent threads on the Avlis forums where our players discussed these changes:
http://www.avlis.org/viewtopic.php?t=40356
http://www.avlis.org/viewtopic.php?t=37990
(1) At level 6 of Pale Master, the undead graft should give +4 to STR in PnP.
(2) Immunity to Criticals at level 10 should also give immunity to sneak attack. NWN botched this and it doesn't. (From the PH--anything immune to criticals is automatically immune to sneak attacks).
Why I bring this up here: If Avlis does a fix of this, it would be done by dynamically adding properties to the new creature hide system that Mistcaller coded. This means that a character recieving these abilities on world X would have them when they portal to world Y, since their hide comes along for the ride. So if Avlis implements these changes, all pale masters across CoPaP will likely recieve them, so CoPaP input is a must before deciding if these should go in.
There are two relavent threads on the Avlis forums where our players discussed these changes:
http://www.avlis.org/viewtopic.php?t=40356
http://www.avlis.org/viewtopic.php?t=37990
-
- Ambassador: Hala
- Posts: 447
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 3:57 am
On recommendation I would make to this... if you are going to PnP one PrC... we should probably do it with all of them. Shadowdancer for one kinda gets the shaft when it comes to abilities they should have gotten, such as their DD type ability and things of that nature. There are others that also have things that could stand to be more in line with the PnP versions of them
I don't see a problem with doing this if it can be fixed by simply adding something to custom hides. We already check for PrC levels in our default OnEnter.
If by DD you mean dimension door, this isn't easily do-able-and probably requires .2da editing. There are many examples of things like that (clerical domains, missing epic spells for bards, pale master summons). These could be do-able but require more than a simple code addition to the checks we already do OnEnter. If we think its a good thing to do and get a list of the things that can be added simply as hide properties, I'll gladly code them all, but .2da editing is beyond my scope at the moment...
If by DD you mean dimension door, this isn't easily do-able-and probably requires .2da editing. There are many examples of things like that (clerical domains, missing epic spells for bards, pale master summons). These could be do-able but require more than a simple code addition to the checks we already do OnEnter. If we think its a good thing to do and get a list of the things that can be added simply as hide properties, I'll gladly code them all, but .2da editing is beyond my scope at the moment...
-
- CoPaP: Player Coordinator
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:40 am
Not just with PrCs either. I am still bitter about the absence of most of my favorite epic spellcaster feats. I loved expanded spell capacity, and the metamagic feat that lowers the spell level of a meta-magiced feat (makes a maximized fireball level 6 instead of 5, for instance.) I would buy these even given that you can only metamagic a spell once in NWN.Arkonswrath wrote: There are others that also have things that could stand to be more in line with the PnP versions of them
Will we be seeing these feats in CoPaP any time soon? I'd much rather buy 10th level and higher slots than epic spells.
Re: Proposal for Pale Masters
Bioware fixed this in their latest patch (currently in beta.)hylia wrote:(2) Immunity to Criticals at level 10 should also give immunity to sneak attack. NWN botched this and it doesn't. (From the PH--anything immune to criticals is automatically immune to sneak attacks).
Just saw a wilderness update by PJ, which included "lastest imports." I logged in but saw no STR adjustment. Maybe the server needs to reset first, or it wasn't included. Should I be expecting the STR adjustment with this update? (*crosses fingers*) Thanks.hylia wrote:I'm doing a major wilderness update. I'll code it up along with that.

-
- Groundling
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 7:29 am
- Location: Avlis Team - Tairis'nadur Team
-
- Groundling
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 7:29 am
- Location: Avlis Team - Tairis'nadur Team